Archive

Archive for November 3rd, 2009

SCOTTEVEST/SeV | Feature Options

November 3rd, 2009
Twitter It!
0
Digg me
Do you think this would help conversions?

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: Danny Caudillo <danny@avetar.com>
Date: November 3, 2009 2:48:41 PM MST
To: Scott Jordan <scottevest@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Avedissian <robert@avetar.com>, thomscottevest@gmail.com
Subject: SCOTTEVEST/SeV | Feature Options
Reply-To: danny@avetar.com

Scott,

If you could please view the attached (JPG) file and let me know which of the (4) options you would like to see as the layout for the featured bullets that would be great. Thank you!

dannycaudillo
//avetar interactive
818.705.3415
5530 corbin ave.
tarzana, ca 91356
www.avetar.com

Posted via email from scottevest’s posterous

Scottevest Scottevest

MPI Magazine

November 3rd, 2009
Twitter It!
0
Digg me

another great article!

Thom,

Sorry for the delay. Thank you so much for your contribution to the October issue of MPI magazine One+. Here is a copy for your files. Please let me know if there is anything else I can do.

Jessie States  
Assistant Editor

Meeting Professionals International


Download now or preview on posterous

pages-24 15.pdf (113 KB)

Posted via email from scottevest’s posterous

Scottevest Scottevest

What do you think of this: Intelligent Product Selection/Comparison Mock-up

November 3rd, 2009
Twitter It!
0
Digg me

———- Forwarded message ———
http://www.dsdwebworks.com/sev/

I should preface this example with a couple of comments.

This is a 'functional mock-up' with the intent of having enough functionality and visual appearance to determine the desirability of the presentation.
That means the specifics of the visuals are not important in evaluating the value. In addition, some of the product data may be inaccurate or missing.

In other words, I spent the minimum amount of time creating a mock-up that has enough data and visual /functional quality for, hopefully, a realistic evaluation.

For example, I just noticed something I would change. Why have unisex, male and female. Just have male and female and then display all male and unisex products or all female and unisex products upon selection.

Let me know your thoughts.

Posted via email from scottevest’s posterous

Scottevest Scottevest

Vlog

November 3rd, 2009
Twitter It!
0
Digg me

Sent from my iPhone
www.scottevest.com

Posted via email from scottevest’s posterous

Scottevest Scottevest

Conversion Rate on Website still 1/2 of what it should be…..

November 3rd, 2009
Twitter It!
0
Digg me

Yet another terrible day with the new website. Only 1.4% conversion rate.

Posted via email from scottevest’s posterous

Scottevest Scottevest


Video & Audio Comments are proudly powered by Riffly