Archive

Archive for November 4th, 2009

X-Ray comp

November 4th, 2009
Twitter It!
0
Digg me
Thoughts welcom

http://www.scottevest.com/v3_store/Fleece_Jacket_ave.shtml

What further changes should we make?

* Rename replay button “Replay X-Ray”
* Hold as x-ray view 2 seconds longer (Danny you might have been right)
* Add the word X-Ray View as in Skymall on the X-Ray shoulder

Posted via email from scottevest’s posterous

Scottevest Scottevest

New Checkout Conversion Data

November 4th, 2009
Twitter It!
0
Digg me

More information on conversion rate issues, now focusing on the cart.

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Brennan Heyde <

 

 

January 1, 2009 – September 30, 2009

% Drop

 

October 11, 2009 – October 17, 2009

% Drop

October 25, 2009 – October 31, 2009

% Drop

3-Nov-09

% Drop

Site Visits

453,628

 

 

13,175

 

16,842

 

4,975

 

Basket Contents

42,405

90.65%

 

1,242

90.57%

803

95.23%

225

95.48%

Customer Information

16,293

61.58%

 

512

58.78%

575

28.39%

158

29.78%

Shipping/Payment Selection

12,826

21.28%

 

399

22.07%

376

34.61%

107

32.28%

Payment Information

11,662

9.08%

 

357

10.53%

246

34.57%

89

16.82%

 Invoice

11,070

5.08%

 

335

6.16%

232

5.69%

85

4.49%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion Rate

2.44%

 

 

2.54%

 

1.38%

 

1.71%

 

 

 

 

Hey Scott –

 

First the report you sent this morning does identify the root of the problem. 5% fewer people are adding products to the cart and just leaving the page which is why your exit rates are higher and conversions down. Mark and I are reviewing your product pages again to see if we can come up with any more suggestions on what may be causing this.

 

Mark ran the same report on the checkout process for the November 3rd. This is the first 24 hour period after we made the new changes to the checkout. The new data is in yellow above. We are taking a 1 day snapshot and comparing it to a week or a month which is not always ideal but it does give us some more information as to if the changes we made to the checkout had an effect on overall conversions.

 

As you can see above the percentage of people adding a product to the cart stayed consisten at 95% drop rate. From there 29.78% of people dropped off when going from the basket to the customer information page. This is much better than your old site and roughly even with what it was before we made these changes. The 1 % increase is most likely because of the small sample size.

 

From there 32.28% of people dropped off going from the customer information to payment shippping selection. This is better than what it was the week after the launch but still not beter than the 21 / 22% average drop of the old site. This means that there is still room for improvement. The two biggest changes we made to this page is switching bill to and ship to and also hiding the ship to field. We can try un hiding it and see if that has any impact.

 

The next page (payment/ shipping selection) 16.82% of the people dropped off. This is a great improvement than what it was the week prior (34.5%). This can be attributed to us putting the continue button at the top and of the page above the fold.

 

Finally the last page going from the payment page to the invoice page increased to only a 4.49% drop from a 5.69% drop previously.

 

Overall our changes did make a positive impact. Our biggest trouble spot now for the checkout process is the customer Information page. Do you want to us to unhide the ship to box?

 

Let me know if this all makes sense. I can review it in a call if you want as well.

 

- Brennan

 


…………………………………………………………………………..

…………………………………………………………………………..

 

Posted via email from scottevest’s posterous

Scottevest Scottevest

I love our customers. Check out these great thoughts from Patrick Rigney

November 4th, 2009
Twitter It!
0
Digg me

I love our customers.   Check out these great thoughts.

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Patrick Rigney

Scott,

Here's my 2 cents, for what it's worth. Honestly, I spent ten years
developing online stores and e-commerce technologies, including some
major vendor sites in apparel, and I can't point to anything on the
site that would account for a 50% reduction in sales. A few points for
small nits, maybe, but 50%? No.

* Red buttons — red is generally regarded as an alarming color. I
understand that you're trying to focus on a call to action, and match
your color scheme, but you might test cooler colors, as well as
popular "buy now" warm/hot colors like orange–Tide boxes are orange
for a reason. I also think the button is too large–too "in your
face."

* I think the zoom is distracting, especially since it pops up over
the call to action. Instead of zoom, as I suggested before, do
X-ray-in place when the cursor is over the product image.

* The zoom view as it is does not work properly on IE8 on Windows–the
"magnifying glass" on the left doesn't follow the image under the
cursor, it just shows whatever was under the cursor when the zoom
started.

* On Chrome, sometimes the zoom doesn't come up at all, it just blanks
out the color/size/quantity area to white and does nothing–this was
observed on Quantum jacket, Pack Windbreaker and Tropical Jacket, but
not on other products. Sometimes refreshing the page would "wake it
up" so I'm guessing it's not really product related, but rather some
kind of race condition with the JavaScript on the page.

* If you click on a color swatch to see the product in that color, the
drop-down should also change to that color–fewer clicks because
shoppers are lazy.

* At 1024×768 resolution, all of the "cool stuff" is below the
fold–the strip of photos and video to click on are lost, as well as
the product details and key features. There's nothing going on at the
bottom of the page to tell you that there's something down there to
look at–you'd never know if you didn't bother to scroll. That leaves
the product page looking pretty "vanilla". I also tried 800×600, but
the site was obviously not designed for that resolution (which is
probably OK).

* I've asked a couple of people here (all SeV clients) what they
think, and they all said that the old site expressed more "cool
factor". They tossed out the idea that the video of the product should
just roll in embedded form underneath the "$5 SHIPPING EVERY ORDER
EVERY DAY" message area, and the links and bits currently in that
position should be relocated elsewhere. It was also suggested that you
make some of the product shots with the models more prominent, like
your old catalog; the follow-on to that was the new site doesn't feel
as personal. Everyone asked to see the old site for comparison, and
made their comments from their memory of it.

I think it would be really helpful if you could get the old site up
someplace. It doesn't need to be fully functional, just up enough to
let us see the product pages again.

I also think you shouldn't look at the exit rate alone–you need to
look at cart abandonment. You can be tearing your hair out looking at
why people are exiting on the product page, when they are actually
putting something in the cart, hitting "Continue Shopping", and then
exiting later–that's a different problem and no amount of jockeying
on the product page structure is likely to solve it.

I wonder, too, if people aren't just tightening up their belts a bit
as the holidays approach.

Patrick

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Scott Jordan wrote:
> After trying to figure out why our conversions were down by 50% for 2 weeks
> now, Thom ran the attached Exit Rate report comparing the period before and
> after the new site.  It clearly shows that people are exiting our PRODUCT
> pages at a MUCH higher rate than before, in some cases as high as 80% higher
> rate than before.  The problem has not been solved but at least identified
> and limited to the Product Pages, not the home page or the index pages.  It
> seems that although the product pages appear MUCH nicer looking and focused
> more on the product, there is something about them that is causing people to
> leave the site.  Now we just need to identify what on these pages is causing
> people to leave, e.g. is zoom confusing?  Any thoughts on this would be much
> appreciated.  Boy am I glad we didn't revert to the new site and keep same
> product pages from new site.
>
>
>
>
>
>

Posted via email from scottevest’s posterous

Scottevest Scottevest

Margaux, white Standard poodle, going for a ride!

November 4th, 2009
Twitter It!
0
Digg me

Posted via email from scottevest’s posterous

Scottevest Scottevest

FINALLY, we identified key problem why Conversion have been down by 50%

November 4th, 2009
Twitter It!
0
Digg me

After trying to figure out why our conversions were down by 50% for 2 weeks now, Thom ran the attached Exit Rate report comparing the period before and after the new site.  It clearly shows that people are exiting our PRODUCT pages at a MUCH higher rate than before, in some cases as high as 80% higher rate than before.  The problem has not been solved but at least identified and limited to the Product Pages, not the home page or the index pages.  It seems that although the product pages appear MUCH nicer looking and focused more on the product, there is something about them that is causing people to leave the site.  Now we just need to identify what on these pages is causing people to leave, e.g. is zoom confusing?  Any thoughts on this would be much appreciated.  Boy am I glad we didn't revert to the new site and keep same product pages from new site.  

Posted via email from scottevest’s posterous

Scottevest Scottevest


Video & Audio Comments are proudly powered by Riffly